Minutes
OF Special
COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON
Tuesday 14 June 2016
AT 6pm
In Council Chamber, 25 Ferres Boulevard, South Morang
Special Council Minutes Tuesday 14 June 2016
COUNCILLORS
STEVAN KOZMEVSKI MAYOR, SOUTH WEST WARD
KRIS PAVLIDIS SOUTH WEST WARD
DARRYL SINCLAIR SOUTH WEST WARD
ADRIAN SPINELLI SOUTH WEST WARD
NORM KELLY DEPUTY MAYOR, SOUTH EAST WARD
SAM ALESSI SOUTH EAST WARD
KEN HARRIS SOUTH EAST WARD
MARY LALIOS SOUTH EAST WARD
REX GRIFFIN NORTH WARD
RICKY KIRKHAM NORTH WARD
CHRISTINE STOW NORTH WARD
Special Council Minutes Tuesday 14 June 2016
SENIOR OFFICERS
MICHAEL WOOTTEN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
RUSSELL HOPKINS DIRECTOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
STEVE O’BRIEN DIRECTOR PLANNING AND MAJOR PROJECTS
NICK MANN DIRECTOR CITY TRANSPORT & PRESENTATION
MICHAEL TONTA ACTING DIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICES
SEAN MCMANUS ACTING DIRECTOR PARTNERSHIPS & ENGAGEMENT
ANGELO MAMATIS TEAM LEADER GOVERNANCE
Special Council Minutes Tuesday 14 June 2016
ORDER OF BUSINESS
The Chief Executive Officer submits the following business:
1.1 MEETING OPENING AND PRAYER
1.2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS STATEMENT
4.1.1 COUNCILLORS CODE OF CONDUCT 2016
Note:
In these Minutes, Resolutions adopted by Council are indicated in bold text.
1. Opening
1.1 MEETING OPENING AND PRAYER
The Chief Executive Officer opened the meeting with a prayer at 6.00PM.
1.2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS STATEMENT
On behalf of the Whittlesea City Council I recognise the rich indigenous heritage of this country and acknowledge the Wurundjeri Willam Clan as the traditional custodians of this place.
Members:
Cr Stevan Kozmevski Mayor (South West Ward)
Cr Kris Pavlidis Councillor (South West Ward)
Cr Darryl Sinclair Councillor (South West Ward)
Cr Norm Kelly Deputy Mayor (South East Ward)
Cr Sam Alessi Councillor (South East Ward)
Cr Mary Lalios Councillor (South East Ward)
Cr Ricky Kirkham Councillor (North Ward)
Cr Christine Stow Councillor (North Ward)
Officers:
Mr Michael Wootten Chief Executive Officer
Mr Steve O'Brien Director Planning and Major Projects
Mr Russell Hopkins Director Community Services
Mr Nick Mann Director City Transport & Presentation
Mr Michael Tonta Acting Director Corporate Services
Mr Sean McManus Acting Director Partnerships & Engagement
Mr Angelo Mamatis Team Leader Governance
2. Apologies
|
Apologies were received on behalf of Cr Griffin, Cr Harris and Cr Spinelli who requested that leave be granted for this meeting. |
|
Council Resolution Moved: Cr Stow Seconded: Cr Kirkham
THAT the apologies from Cr Griffin, Cr Harris and Cr Spinelli be received and leave be granted. Carried |
3. Declarations of Interest
NIL
4. Officers’ Reports
4.1.1 COUNCILLORS CODE OF CONDUCT 2016
File No: 163964
Attachments: 1 Draft Councillors Code of Conduct 2016
2 Councillors Code of Conduct 2016 adopted by Council
Responsible Officer: Acting Director Corporate Services
Author: Team Leader Governance
Report
Summary
It is a legislated requirement that Council amend and adopt the Councillors Code of Conduct (‘the Code’) by 4 July 2016 at a Special Council meeting held specifically to consider the amended Code.
The Code specifies the agreed standard of Councillor behaviour required for the ethical and professional performance of Councillors duties under Section 76C of the Local Government Act 1989.
The amended Code reflects the amendments contained in the Local Government Amendment (Improved Governance) Act 2015 (‘the Act’). (Refer to Attachment 1).
Background
The main change to the current Code relates to the mandatory requirement for an Internal Dispute Resolution Procedure and the appointment of a Principal Conduct Officer.
In addition, a number of new provisions have been included in the Code taken from the Model Councillor Code of Conduct prepared by the Municipal Association of Victoria aimed at promoting good governance.
The new hierarchy for management of Councillor conduct issues introduced by the Act is designed to reinforce the responsibility and authority of Council to manage breaches of agreed conduct through a mandatory internal resolution procedure. It also provides for allegations of misconduct and serious misconduct to be referred to a Councillor Conduct Panel only after Council has tried to resolve the matter internally.
The Chief Executive Officer is required to appoint a senior officer to the position of Principal Conduct Officer to assist with the implementation of the Code including the conduct of the internal resolution procedure.
Proposal
Mandatory changes to the Code
The revised Code is designed to ensure that Council makes every effort to resolve disputes and complaints internally before they are referred to a Councillor Conduct Panel.
In this regard, the Code must contain an internal resolution procedure for addressing alleged breaches and for the selection of an arbiter who is suitably independent and able to carry out the role of arbiter fairly.
The role of the arbiter will include considering applications alleging breaches of the Code and making findings in regard to such applications.
The Code must also provide processes to ensure that affected parties have a right to be heard and that the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness are applied.
The arbiter must provide Council with written reasons for any findings. If the arbiter finds that a Councillor has contravened the Code, Council may direct that certain sanctions apply to the Councillor.
The Code also makes reference to section 76E of the Act which prohibits a Councillor from improperly directing or improperly influencing a member of Council staff.
Discretionary changes to the Code
New provisions have been added to the Code to provide clarity on the functions of the Mayor and the role of Councillors and the functions of the Chief Executive Officer.
Definitions are included for ‘arbiter’, ‘misconduct’ and ‘principal conduct officer’. The Gift and Hospitality provisions make reference to the Councillors Gifts Benefits and Hospitality Register and note that the acceptance of gifts can give rise to an indirect conflict of interest.
Reference is made to the provisions in the Local Government Act on Misuse of Position as provisions contain examples of circumstances involving misuse which can provide a further context to assist in guiding Councillor behaviour.
The discretionary provisions provide guidance to Councillors on interpreting the Code and complying with its requirements.
Dispute Resolution Provisions
The Code provides for a phased approach to resolving disputes. Before commencing any formal dispute resolution process, the Councillors who are parties to a dispute are expected to use their best endeavours to resolve the matter in a courteous and respectful manner between themselves.
Where, after these endeavours have been exhausted, the matter still remains unresolved, the parties must participate in the three phases of the dispute resolution process.
Phase 1 - Direct Negotiation - Mayor
Where Councillors, who are in dispute, have not been able to resolve the dispute between them, either (or both) party (parties) may request the Mayor to convene a meeting of the parties.
The Mayor is to convene a meeting of the parties at the earliest available opportunity and, with the assistance of the Principle Conduct Officer. The role of the Mayor at the meeting is to provide guidance to Councillors about what is expected of a Councillor including in relation to the role of a Councillor under section 65 of the Act, and the observation of the Councillor Conduct Principles and the Code.
Phase 2 - External Mediation - Mediator
A Councillor or a group of Councillors may make an application for a dispute to be referred for external mediation provided that the dispute has been the subject of an application for ‘direct negotiation’.
The applicant is to submit a written application to the Principal Conduct Officer setting out the name of the Councillor and the details of the dispute. The Principal Conduct Officer must engage the services of an external mediator to conduct the mediation as soon as practicable.
The mediator is to document any agreement reached at the meeting. Copies of the agreement are to be provided to both parties. Where one party does not comply with the agreement, the other party has recourse to the internal resolution procedure where the matter relates to an alleged contravention of the Code.
Phase 3 - Internal Resolution Procedure – Arbiter
If the dispute continues to be unresolved after mediation, the third and final phase of the dispute resolution process is invoked. This phase is prescribed under the Act and involves the appointment of a suitably independent arbiter to fairly consider the alleged contravention and make findings in relation to the alleged contravention which the arbiter must give to Council.
The internal resolution procedure will supersede the Governance Committee procedure in the current Code.
Sanctions
If the arbiter finds that a Councillor has contravened the Code, Council may give any or all of the following directions to a Councillor:
· to make an apology;
· direct the Councillor not attend up to two Council Meetings;
· direct that, for a period of up to two months, the Councillor:
o be removed from any positions where they represent Council;
o not chair or attend any meeting specified in the direction including an advisory committee or assembly of Councillors.
Consultation
Councillors have been consulted on the draft Code and have provided feedback.
Critical Dates
Council must review and adopt the revised Code by 4 July 2016 and again within four months after general Council elections. This revised Code must be adopted at a Special Council Meeting called solely for the purpose of reviewing and adopting the Code.
Financial Implications
Legal costs associated with reviewing the Code will be met within existing budgets.
Policy strategy and legislation
Councillors are required to make a declaration that they will abide by the Code in the presence of the Chief Executive Officer within one month of the Code being adopted. A Councillor who does not make the declaration is disqualification from acting as a Councillor.
Links to the CoUNCIL Plan
FUTURE DIRECTION Good Governance
Theme Continuous improvements
Strategic Objective Council adopts best practice models of operation
The Code will promote good governance of the Council by specifying agreed standards of Councillor behaviour required for the ethical and professional performance of Councillors duties.
Declarations of Conflicts of Interest
Under section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989 officers providing advice to Council must disclose any interests, including the type of interest.
The Responsible Officer reviewing this report, having made enquiries with the relevant members of staff, reports that no disclosable interests have been raised in relation to this report.
Conclusion
The Code promotes good governance by setting out the standards of conduct expected of Councillors. It also endeavours to foster good working relations between Councillors to enable them to work constructively together in the best interests of the local community.
|
THAT Council resolve to adopt the Councillors Code of Conduct as attached to this report. |
|
Moved: Cr Kelly Seconded: Cr Sinclair THAT Council resolve to amend the Councillors Code of Conduct as follows and adopt the Councillors Code of Conduct as shown in attachment 2:- 1. Introduction – page 5 addition of the following sentence to paragraph 2: Parties to a dispute will use their best endeavours to resolve any dispute within the timelines set out in the Code and otherwise in a reasonable time. 2. Dispute Resolution Phase 2 – page 13 amend as follows: · The Principal Conduct Officer must engage the services of an external mediator to conduct the mediation as soon as practicable and not later than 10 working days after the parties agree to participate in external mediation. · If the parties cannot resolve the dispute at the meeting, a further meeting may be convened with the consent of both parties within 7 working days. Where the dispute remains unresolved, the applicant may have recourse to the internal resolution procedure where the matter relates to an alleged contravention of the Code. 3. Dispute Resolution Phase 3 – page 14 amend as follows · consider the grounds of any objection and appoint the proposed arbiter or identify another arbiter within 7 working days; · after consultation with the arbiter, advise the applicant and the respondent of the time and place · for the hearing which should be held within fifteen (15) working days of the appointment of the arbiter; and Carried |
|
|
5. Closure
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MAYOR DECLARED THE MEETING CLOSED AT 6.08PM.
CONFIRMED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2016
________________________
CR STEVAN KOZMEVSKI
MAYOR